58 links have been added on 18 ideas about #truth.
  1. Seems like you can host 2 contradictory ideas in societies, in words and in your own mind. Its a problem, yet not an issue 🙂

  2. And sections of society have internal battles with reality – those early Sumerians that thought there was more to the heavens than just God – are weirdly similar to the conspiracy nuts who still think the same thing – despite all the knowledge now amassed.

  3. Both – obviously or we wouldn’t be having this debate over the simplest of ideas.

  4. Ahh, nope.

  5. You can still just choose the set of evidence you want to use – depending on your existing standpoint. So no help really.

  6. Over three-quarters of Mark’s content is found in both Matthew and Luke, and 97% of Mark is found in at least one of the other two synoptic gospels. Additionally, Matthew (24%) and Luke (23%) have material in common that is not found in Mark.

  7. Same story – different spin – blatant that they kept all versions in there – a good way to give a bit of what everyone needs to belive, I guess.

  8. Most scholars agree that Mathew is a propaganda version of Marc that was put in its place at the start of the new testament. Not just fudging it with obvious additions that Jesus was descended from Abraham/Moses/David etc, but also that he got stuck in Egypt, was a Nazarean, and all the other stuff that needed to be ticked in order for existing Jews to accept they had a new messiah on their hands. Pretty obvious to those who actually read the bible in a historic context. Watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCyFw3jnoUk

  9. RudeJude

    To be fair many educated jews spotted right away that Mathew just added a bunch of stuff that would allow us to follow Christ without rousing rabbis – little did they know the book they wrote was a hit with gentiles, which was a bit lucky (in that it gave rise to the biggest world religion within a few hundred years). Funny old world.

  10. Chat GPT4 could both produce content and police its use too.

    Added on 9 ideasView all 9 ideas this link was added to.
  11. Wouldn’t trust AI to monitor AI behaviour and decide which output to flag or ban. Maybe a contest between different agents to see which one would perform best as an arbiter of truth, or monitor of plagiarism at least. Just a thought as not all systems would be as effective as Google in deciding what is true or not.

  12. How about sci-evangelist? That works for this guy “I’m now happier and healthier. I’m following a path worn by Isaac Asimov, Carl Sagan, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and Bill Nye: lecturing, writing, and publicizing science. My new vocation offers less security than the old one did, but that seems fitting somehow. It’s wilder and more precious.”

  13. Sure, but science is about discovering truths. and about the lives of the people discovering it. Nature has no ideas, scientists do.

  14. Cases of “rhetorical hyperbole” fall outside libel law. Some of former President Trump’s pre-White House lawsuits set precedents in this regard.

  15. Ahh, no. Jesus was a Jew, probably the worst Jew when you consider what he did to the religion. He even stole things and didn’t feel bad about it or ask for forgiveness. He didn’t follow himself and was not without sin. Not the type of sin his followers would have recognized anyways. Think again.

  16. You can sin. You just need to realise it may land you in damnation.

  17. Genius – Nietzsche portrays Christ as an anti-establishment upsetter of the order of power. You know, Trump of yesteryear 😉

  18. Truth, is a loaded word, but yeah…

    “In mathematics, there are imaginary numbers which cannot be represented directly in reality (the physical world). For example, you can’t have i apples where

    i = √-1 (square root of -1)

    Can we then say that in some sense mathematics is not truth, assuming truth in this sense is that which is manifest or possible in reality?”

  19. depends on what type of argument i guess. https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/coreofscience_01

  20. Tyson admitted that the saying had existed earlier, it’s not known where he had heard it.

  21. “How do we know that in 1945 the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan? Because of details and facts from all three forms of testimony.”

  22. lol, it wouldn’t be much of a read, with like 20 pages “Most statements by religious people boil down to ipse dixit assertions. “Jesus was resurrected because three women saw him.”

  23. From a Quora user… “If the book of Genesis were written today, it might be written pretty much as it is now. Genesis is not now, nor ever has been, a history textbook. It was never intended as such, and quite frankly, anyone who ever took it as such had some of the poorest critical reading skills ever.”

  24. So far, none of the top brass has even come close, you just resign if it looks like it’s going to hit the fan.

  25. You are not alone with this idea. it needs work for sure…

    Added on 2 ideasView all 2 ideas this link was added to.
  26. Interesting idea. Looked this idea up and there are some legalities involved.

  27. Added on 5 ideasView all 5 ideas this link was added to.