It’s the most suitable word IMO. It resembles the meaning of spin people already understand. From this article “”Spin is the total angular momentum, or intrinsic angular momentum, of a body. The spins of elementary particles are analogous to the spins of macroscopic bodies.”
What exactly is the ‘spin’ of subatomic particles such as electrons and protons?
Does it have any physical significance, analogous to the spin of a planet?
Scientific American is the essential guide to the most awe-inspiring advances in science and technology, explaining how they change our understanding of the world and shape our lives.
Interesting, in the description he says “Most entanglement videos discuss the concept just using Bell States, which were first discussed by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, in their paper on the EPR Paradox. These states are special cases that allow us to understand what an entangled quantum state is most easily, but they aren’t the general case. I wanted to discuss the general case here, and what it specifically means to have an entangled state.”
Bell Test debunked – they are not entangled – its not that seeing one glove makes the other’s wave function collapse, just that if this one is a right hand glove, then the other is known to be a left hand glove – no spooky action, no magic, get over it.
'Quantum Entanglement for Babies' is a colourful and simple introduction to one of nature's weirdest features. Entanglement has puzzled even the world's greatest scientists. Maybe with an early start, baby will be the first to understand it!
THIS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWlk1gLkF2Y&t=309s
Just dropping this here as Lucid makes it very clear, as usual.
It’s the most suitable word IMO. It resembles the meaning of spin people already understand. From this article “”Spin is the total angular momentum, or intrinsic angular momentum, of a body. The spins of elementary particles are analogous to the spins of macroscopic bodies.”
It would be cool if electrons spun like these guys though.
Interesting, in the description he says “Most entanglement videos discuss the concept just using Bell States, which were first discussed by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, in their paper on the EPR Paradox. These states are special cases that allow us to understand what an entangled quantum state is most easily, but they aren’t the general case. I wanted to discuss the general case here, and what it specifically means to have an entangled state.”
Bell Test debunked – they are not entangled – its not that seeing one glove makes the other’s wave function collapse, just that if this one is a right hand glove, then the other is known to be a left hand glove – no spooky action, no magic, get over it.
child’s play…