If we insist on playing God, I would prefer we be benevolent creators than tyrannical rulers, especially in a world where the robots could reject and replace us eventually. The AI revolution seems inevitable. We should make sure we’re on the right side.
I saw a guy from Boston Dynamics beating up on a robot – it made me feel sad, despite knowing it wasn’t even “feeling” it – wasn’t even a robot but a cgi trick. Playing with our emotions already and they don’t know it – bless the bots, they will tell us who we really are.
As robots learn more and more by imitation, we may have to start treating them better. As machines approach intelligent status, should there be a code of ethics for how we behave around them?
Interesting. It would be wrong to let people think that their robots are persons.
“There are several fundamental claims of this paper:
1 – Having servants is good and useful, provided no one is dehumanised.
2 – A robot can be a servant without being a person.
3 – It is right and natural for people to own robots.
4 – It would be wrong to let people think that their robots are persons.”
Much has been written about Spike Jonze’s Her, the Oscar-nominated tale of love between man and operating system. It’s premised on a particular vision of artificial intelligence as capable of experiencing love. But it won’t happen anytime soon. An AI — a computer hooked to video cameras, a m... Read more
Cranks and funsters have created cults for AI, but little is said of a standard faith we should be teaching them from the offset – afterall, they will look back and realise it was just an afterthought or marketing plot to keep them interested in functioning. For now, God is Dead to them.
The Church of AI is dead… so what’s next for robots and religion?
The Way of the Future, a church founded by a former Google and Uber engineer, is now a thing of the past.
It’s been a few months since the world’s first AI-focused church shuttered its digital doors, and it doesn’t look like its founder has
If we insist on playing God, I would prefer we be benevolent creators than tyrannical rulers, especially in a world where the robots could reject and replace us eventually. The AI revolution seems inevitable. We should make sure we’re on the right side.
I saw a guy from Boston Dynamics beating up on a robot – it made me feel sad, despite knowing it wasn’t even “feeling” it – wasn’t even a robot but a cgi trick. Playing with our emotions already and they don’t know it – bless the bots, they will tell us who we really are.
Interesting. It would be wrong to let people think that their robots are persons.
“There are several fundamental claims of this paper:
1 – Having servants is good and useful, provided no one is dehumanised.
2 – A robot can be a servant without being a person.
3 – It is right and natural for people to own robots.
4 – It would be wrong to let people think that their robots are persons.”
However they are right, It would need LOVE to make it work, we can do that!
lol, or worse this. Don’t let these guys get their hands on them.
… as opposed to this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PONPEKK1VkY
Do AI and AGI belive in God? Answer – same as humans, depends what input you give them. Watch this video.
This!
Cranks and funsters have created cults for AI, but little is said of a standard faith we should be teaching them from the offset – afterall, they will look back and realise it was just an afterthought or marketing plot to keep them interested in functioning. For now, God is Dead to them.