Capitalism can not exist in a closed environment, communism can not exist in an open one
The acid test for any two competing socioeconomic systems is which side... Read more
by 8-BIT BOBBY Sep 28, 2023 4 Comments 3 Links
#authoritarianism, #capitalism, #economy, #lefft, #liberty, #macroeconomics, #politics, #right, #socialism,
by Steven Bowker Sep 16, 2023 3 Comments 3 Links
#community, #crime, #freedom, #humanity, #justice, #law, #society,
Not all countries allow it’s inhabitants to own land, nevermind getting it for free. I fear most people wouldn’t know what to do with their few acres and it would be wasted. Making human progress difficult. It could actually end civilisation if we demanded to share everything. Think on.
“ven though a lot of those sources put the number at a lot less, the general consensus is that you really need at least 5 acres of land per person to be self-sufficient. And that’s assuming you have quality land, adequate rainfall, and a long growing season.”
“Subtracting this uninhabitable 57% (32,665,981 mi2) from the total land area leaves 24,642,757 square miles or 15.77 billion acres of habitable land. Divide this figure by the current human population of 7 billion (that’s 7,000 million people) and you get 2.3 acres (about one hectare) per person.” according to http://www.zo.utexas.edu/courses/Thoc/land.html#:~:text=Subtracting%20this%20uninhabitable%2057%25%20(32%2C665%2C981,about%20one%20hectare)%20per%20person.
Sounds pretty socialistic but according to this the value we would all get would be immense. Levelling the land, or at least the spare and commonly owned land may be a good thing once in a while.